I dont think we had anyone leave due to leadership .
To the first part of your post, how would you know and what do you mean? I think if their leadership was abysmal, wouldn't they have folded a lot earlier than they actually did?Civils leadership must have been abysmal then.
Nice maps kim. Keep up the good work and come back to off topicaaaa
Now looking at this bold part, how would you know if Civil had abysmal leadership or not if you only logged on for 30 minutes a day/inactive?I intentionally put myself out of the loop. When droid left, basically everyone in royale knew it was coming except me. This may come as a shock, but im not very good or active. Pretty much spent 8 months sending trains at barbs for 30 minutes each day. I can really only blame myself and my ex tribal therapist =(
Hmm. Its like I should just repost my orginal statement. Here, I'll reword it. Civils bad leadership lost to a tribe that even worse leadership. Does that work for you?I dont think we had anyone leave due to leadership .
I do agree that they did well for starting late. But they lost I think simply because they were outmanned and outgunned. At the end of the day TW is still a numbers game. There have been times where the bigger tribe has lost to smaller tribes but more often then not, the bigger tribe will win majority of the time.Hmm. Its like I should just repost my orginal statement. Here, I'll reword it. Civils bad leadership lost to a tribe that even worse leadership. Does that work for you?
Look at k54, k55 with the progression though those. No recruitment has affected those parts.I'm taking prediction bets on NAM rinse and repeating: Recruit > Eat what's between > repeat
Let's be honest... most of the conquers were as a result of the recruitment judging by these maps. :lol:
#1 for nubbiest win