Pnp

DeletedUser

Guest
this will surely make this topic alive, flaming speaking

Side 1:
Tribes: UNDER, TEA
Side 2:
Tribes: Inc, RAWRR

Timeframe: 01/10/2011 00:00:00 to 12/10/2011 15:23:41

Total conquers:

Side 1: 2,250
Side 2: 862
Difference: 1,388

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 420
Side 2: 639
Difference: 219

chart


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 20,644,288
Side 2: 8,249,888
Difference: 12,394,400

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 4,144,737
Side 2: 6,106,934
Difference: 1,962,197

chart
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Well you know what we're going to say. I see no point in including inactives (which is exactly what TEA and RAWRR are). Both sides may be launching nukes from their "sat" players, but to include unmanned accounts in the war stats, feels too much like looking for stat boosters.

I'm not saying that nobling out these "academy"-ish tribes isn't a good idea. It increases your border and vill numbers and stops the other tribe from using the nukes against you. But they shouldn't be in the war stats. Not unless you're prepared to include and debate every inactive account that ever graced our hallowed halls (Medflex comes to mind...I'm sure there's more out there). And let's face it, bragging about nobling out inactive accounts that have been dropped and moved out of tribe...well...

But that's just my humble opinion. I'm sure others will have more to say about it soon enough.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
It's a statistic like any other, since some of Tea and Rawrr accounts are indeed fighting against each other and against main tribes, other then targets of the main tribe's OPs.

I'm sure regarding Tea that some of its players are active and growing, while some Rawr players are surely attacking Under and nobling barbarians and Tea
 

D4alicious

Guest
Side 1:
Tribes: UNDER
Side 2:
Tribes: S.O.L.

Timeframe: Forever
Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 54
Side 2: 69
Difference: 15

chart


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Side 1:
Players: dominic17
Side 2:
Tribes: S.O.L.

Timeframe: Forever

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 2
Side 2: 66
Difference: 64

chart
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Stats don't really matter at this point, 500 villages either way is a drop in the water...

Besides, 99% of those stats are from accounts that aren't really being played or not being played as much as usual anyways, (dominic, -attila-, jcole, etc.) so they're to really be taken with a grain of salt
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Stats don't really matter at this point, 500 villages either way is a drop in the water...

Besides, 99% of those stats are from accounts that aren't really being played or not being played as much as usual anyways, (dominic, -attila-, jcole, etc.) so they're to really be taken with a grain of salt

What???

Not only are you an alias, but an idiot as well! Do you even know what's going on at all?

What do you mean these accts are not being played as much as usual?

And of course the players that are doing the nobling are also "not playing as much as usual" either!
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I dont know who he is either. But why didnt anyone tell me -Attila- wasnt playing?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
What???

Not only are you an alias, but an idiot as well! Do you even know what's going on at all?

What do you mean these accts are not being played as much as usual?

And of course the players that are doing the nobling are also "not playing as much as usual" either!

Okay, I made a mistake about -attila- but jcole and dominic both didn't show much sign of life for a while leading up to the war and haven't really gotten anything done in the war past the initial spike of ODD
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
There in such a bad spot, Active or not they would of gotten raped eventually. It's like Jenkin Rei, he was active had good sitters but eventually got nobled out
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Okay, I made a mistake about -attila- but jcole and dominic both didn't show much sign of life for a while leading up to the war and haven't really gotten anything done in the war past the initial spike of ODD

Yeah, I'm sorry, but a good chunk of the noblings are happening on active and live accounts. I've/We've lost a few vills, and we're on every day. And KiLLLLer has lost more than a good chunk of vills.

I'm sorry, but I have to agree with my compatriots, I don't believe you know of what you speak. The whole point of the NAP leading up to this point was to clean up the main tribes and only have the active accounts fighting. If that's not what's happening now, then I guess I missed the memo.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
No the whole point was so Under could elimnate Rawkor and Boys while Inc also attacked Boys

But really it means nothing at the moment TBH. Stat speaking. I lost 30 or so villages but they were isolated and an inactive account cleared them
 

DeletedUser

Guest
My point is, it's not like the restart of the fighting was a surprise. If either side chose to keep "inactive" accounts within their ranks leading up to and into the war, then those accounts are ripe for the picking (and the stat boost).
 

DeletedUser

Guest
UNDER VS INC
[SPOIL]
Side 1:
Tribes: UNDER
Side 2:
Tribes: Inc

Timeframe: Last 48 hours

Total conquers:

Side 1: 305
Side 2: 75
Difference: 230

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 88
Side 2: 66
Difference: 22

chart


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 2,831,818
Side 2: 706,887
Difference: 2,124,931

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 830,403
Side 2: 624,872
Difference: 205,531

chart

[/SPOIL]

UNDER F. VS INC F.
[SPOIL]
Side 1:
Tribes: UNDER, TEA
Side 2:
Tribes: Inc, RAWRR

Timeframe: Last 48 hours

Total conquers:

Side 1: 372
Side 2: 85
Difference: 287

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 124
Side 2: 73
Difference: 51

chart


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 3,372,185
Side 2: 806,903
Difference: 2,565,282

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,176,637
Side 2: 694,428
Difference: 482,209

chart


[/SPOIL]
 

DeletedUser102559

Guest
Why not try the since the war started.. its so much easier....


Side 1:
Tribes: Inc
Side 2:
Tribes: UNDER

Timeframe: 01/10/2011 00:00:00 to 16/10/2011 05:57:18

Total conquers:

Side 1: 1,016
Side 2: 2,434
Difference: 1,418

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 752
Side 2: 283
Difference: 469

chart


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 9,680,263
Side 2: 23,143,859
Difference: 13,463,596

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 7,178,041
Side 2: 2,714,639
Difference: 4,463,402

chart



To be totally honest the stats mean nothing at this point in time its only been 15 days of the war -.-
 

DeletedUser

Guest
cambsrog do not copy me!! I already said that. lol

Anyways well fought so far. Sure your up 469 caps but it has been well fought
 

DeletedUser

Guest
UNDER VS INC
[SPOIL]
Side 1:
Tribes: UNDER
Side 2:
Tribes: Inc

Timeframe: Last 48 hours

Total conquers:

Side 1: 320
Side 2: 118
Difference: 202

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 122
Side 2: 87
Difference: 35

chart


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 2,975,368
Side 2: 1,130,823
Difference: 1,844,545

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,145,918
Side 2: 831,471
Difference: 314,447

chart

[/SPOIL]
UNDER F. VS INC F.
[SPOIL]
Side 1:
Tribes: UNDER, TEA
Side 2:
Tribes: Inc, RAWRR

Timeframe: Last 48 hours

Total conquers:

Side 1: 380
Side 2: 118
Difference: 262

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 157
Side 2: 90
Difference: 67

chart


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 3,423,810
Side 2: 1,130,823
Difference: 2,292,987

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,475,032
Side 2: 860,257
Difference: 614,775

chart



[/SPOIL]

Since start of the war

[SPOIL]
Side 1:
Tribes: UNDER, TEA
Players: Medflex
Side 2:
Tribes: Inc, RAWRR

Timeframe: 01/10/2011 00:00:00 to 18/10/2011 10:48:28

Total conquers:

Side 1: 3,366
Side 2: 1,173
Difference: 2,193

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 795
Side 2: 884
Difference: 89

chart


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 30,790,992
Side 2: 11,192,982
Difference: 19,598,010

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 7,700,747
Side 2: 8,444,790
Difference: 744,043

chart



[/SPOIL]
 

D4alicious

Guest
Side 1:
Tribes: UNDER
Side 2:
Tribes: RAWKOR

Timeframe: Last 24 hours

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 5
Side 2: 14
Difference: 9

chart


---------------------------------------------

Side 1:
Tribes: UNDER
Side 2:
Tribes: Inc

Timeframe: Last 24 hours

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 25
Side 2: 44
Difference: 19

chart
 

DeletedUser

Guest
LOL with the Rawkor stats. I don't think anyone even cares about them

If we wanted them gone, they would be good fast
 

D4alicious

Guest
I'm sure they care Lambezz, just because you don't - doesn't mean nobody does, or do you speak for the masses now? Maybe I didn't get that memo.

The reason why I posted it is because of a hilarious "threat" mails one of UNDER's members has been sending to RAWKOR. I won't post the whole thing as it's not my place but with exerts like "average skill of your members" and "and yours and your tribe presence is W44 is pretty worthless" I thought it was fitting to prove this person wrong. As obviously their presence isn't worthless if they can take 14 villages from the Rank 1 tribe in 24 hours.
 
Top