Mate I think you miss the entire concept of what I am saying here , your reading right , but not everything is the way it appears , I am merely ragging on Beast for ragging on me the way they did in 90 . They didn't care about the odds in 90 , so why should I care about the odds in 100 . Thanks for you curiosity though .So if no tribe could survive the odds, how on earth does that prove that beasts is bad?
There is a clear difference between:
Tribes A and B at war. Half of tribe B quit, tribe A wins due to overwhelming odds.
Tribes A and B go to war against tribe C with overwhelming odds in their favor and win.
I wouldnt be suprised if you cant tell the difference given the comments i have seen from you so far on the forum, but there is one.
PS: I did not play w90, I am merely responding to the sceneario you described to me.