~TKE~ vs ~PWN~ / eQu

DeletedUser70293

Guest
eQu is winning by more then 3k points.

Side 1:
Tribes: eQu
Players:
Side 2:
Tribes: ~TKE~
Players:
Timeframe: Last month
Total conquers:
Side 1: 369
Side 2: 385
Difference: 16
chart

Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 30
Side 2: 25
Difference: 5
chart

Points value of total conquers:
Side 1: 1,704,857
Side 2: 1,059,010
Difference: 645,847
chart

Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 171,038
Side 2: 160,557
Difference: 10,481
chart
 

DeletedUser

Guest
5 more villages and only 10 K up in stats, thats average of 2 K villages, great achievement :lol:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
AH i dunno if you are in PWN or TKE but TKE seems to be doing a better job cause even though they are down on village loses the points of the villages you are taking isn't really worth the effort
 

DeletedUser70293

Guest
kentster82 said:
AH i dunno if you are in PWN or TKE but TKE seems to be doing a better job cause even though they are down on village loses the points of the villages you are taking isn't really worth the effort
Click to expand...

I'm a part of eQu.

Doesn't the saying go "points don't win wars, troops do"? Less villages = Less troops. Each lost village means one less in our K anyway. Points are irrelevant when each and every one of TKE's villages will be assimilated into eQu anyway.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
yea but 1 10k village can usually pump out troops 2 or 3x as fast as a 2k point one so yes in this case points do matter cause if they are taking better villages the make troops faster
 

kurlnova

Guest
mikebiscuit said:
5 more villages and only 10 K up in stats, thats average of 2 K villages, great achievement :lol:
Click to expand...

Since that sounded patently ridiculous (because I know we don't take almost any villages of that size usually), I looked at the stats. Guess what?

Point value of the last 10 villages taken from TKE by eQu:

7.616
4.853
5.293
7.434
*2.272
*2.289
8.636
8.675
*2.204
3.724
11.774

See that 2k vil with the (*)? Winds up it's the same village getting swapped back and forth between the teams in a hotly contested piece of geography.

You know what they say about "averages." :icon_biggrin:

Oh, and don't worry kenster - eQu is in no danger of falling behind in troop production. :icon_wink:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I just came to say: eQu will demolish ~TKE~ and ~WE~ will take out eQu and CORE and ~WE~, have fun ;)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
matthewso4 said:
Don't over-estimate yourselves. Get a spy in our tribe and you'll see you're hardly even mentioned in our forums and that's because you guys are the least of our concerns. Actually, the last time you guys were even mentioned in the leaders' forum was 4 days ago and that's because a few of your members wanted to join us, other than that it's been at least a week that we haven't talked about you guys lol. But think whatever you want to help your tribe feel all big and bad. Now, are you guys going to keep on crying about PWN or keep on fighting?
Click to expand...

im not in tke so i dont over-estimate anyone.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Considering eQu had at best 10 players (more now) fighting 30 TKE's in our SE K73/74 area - i'd say those numbers indicate a much higher OD for eQu. We'll just have to wait and see who is right in the end.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
why don't we put it this way as of now no one that matters cares about this war
 

DeletedUser70293

Guest
kentster82 said:
why don't we put it this way as of now no one that matters cares about this war
Click to expand...

TKE do. If you don't like the thread, leave.

To add, this may be a war for TKE. But it is casual expansion for eQu.
 
Last edited:

DeletedUser

Guest
Austrian HighLord said:
TKE do. If you don't like the thread, leave.

To add, this may be a war for TKE. But it is casual expansion for eQu.
Click to expand...

Casual expansion does not need a PnP.

I have been leading !UN! for over 4 months now,
we have always been at war with someone,
yet you do not see a PnP for every single tribe we have warred.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
howey said:
Casual expansion does not need a PnP.

I have been leading !UN! for over 4 months now,
we have always been at war with someone,
yet you do not see a PnP for every single tribe we have warred.
Click to expand...

He's not the one making the PnP, he's simply defending his tribe which you would undoubtedly do if your tribe was accused of something that wasn't true, even if the accusations was from a small tribe like TKE, no? It was TKE that made this PnP, not us (AHL is in eQu). There'd be dozens of PnP if we were to make one for each tribe we're clearing.

@scouserjoe: Sorry, maybe next time you should know more about what's going on before making bold statements like that. Especially if you're not even a part of it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

kurlnova

Guest
howey said:
Casual expansion does not need a PnP.

I have been leading !UN! for over 4 months now,
we have always been at war with someone,
yet you do not see a PnP for every single tribe we have warred.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Tell it to TKE, it's their thread.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
matthewso4 said:
He's not the one making the PnP, he's simply defending his tribe which you would undoubtedly do if your tribe was accused of something that wasn't true, even if the accusations was from a small tribe like TKE, no? It was TKE that made this PnP, not us (AHL is in eQu). There'd be dozens of PnP if we were to make one for each tribe we're clearing.

@scouserjoe: Sorry, maybe next time you should know more about what's going on before making bold statements like that. Especially if you're not even a part of it.
Click to expand...

theres nothing more to know about it matthew equ were struggling against tke with only a 3k diffrence so they asked pwn to send attacks at tke its simples as the meercat would say.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top