You have AM? lol clearly u should get your money back coz it doesnt seem to rebuild anything...
You don't have time for talking on the externals, get back into Debbie's backpack please.
And yet.Lol, I love how you W2V players brag.. The only two notable players that have attacked me with some wit or even timed support is Bullet and Ngazpha..
Timeframe: Last week
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 355
Side 2: 110
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 3,264,820
Side 2: 1,006,784
Which week should I have posted?SlowThinker, did you really just post war stats of the last week on conquers? Sad that you are basing it off of mostly inactive conquers as well. Let's not forget about the mailing that Gen sent to Gerhan before he quit...not to mention all the inactivity on specific accounts...Until this war actually has a steady front, which soon enough it will have. This is just a war over inactives.
:icon_rolleyes:So you are saying just because W1V as a whole is bad just because of a few inactives? Interesting. I hope you keep this mentality until the end of the World.
Not my fault people in W2V quit either. Nor was it my point that they were any good. My point was that W1V was bad. :icon_wink:
I remember Venus players flaming Contra players for claiming all the people that got nobled were inactives.You said that W1V is bad. I am just trying to clarify the fact that a very healthy amount of those conquers have been inactives. If you looked at overall stats you would see this.
As for judging...i am simply trying to explain to you that you are looking at the stats with a blind eye. If those stats showed conquers of all "ACTIVE" accounts i would be impressed and agree with you 100%. But it does not.
I remember Venus players flaming Contra players for claiming all the people that got nobled were inactives.
I guess opinions change when it's your players that are getting nobled out :lol: