DeletedUser
Guest
Conflicting stats so which ones the truth?
It's more about using your brain when you analyse and draw conclusions from statistics, as opposed to looking at them in isolation and making sweeping generalisations.
You mean, it's more about picking the right date to start from as to not give your enemy an edge in stats...like you did matty! I'm sure prime had more conquers previous to the date in which you picked for the stats :icon_rolleyes:
You get a fail sticker for deleting the post.
The stats should be from the day randerson made that post, no other date.
If I'm guilty of any manipulation it's only for adding wizzydizzy, as clearly to include him in the latest stats when he hasn't been previously included (purely from a Pron perspective as he is now in the tribe) would skew the results and make them less meaningful, but by all means if there are players I should be including with Prime's stats let me know.
I was concerned I was misreading his post and wrongly flaming him as a result, so the reasonable thing was for me to delete that flame, nothing more, nothing less.
You should add hefty, since he claims to be the mastermind behind all of this :icon_rolleyes:
I am your god, and have deemed the post fail.
New stats.
Side 1:
Tribes: AOS KilTom S.A.W FEAR?!
Players: wizzydizzy Sinaelyan
Side 2:
Tribes: Prime
Players:
Timeframe: Last month
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 691
Side 2: 1,391
Difference: 700
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 6,498,948
Side 2: 13,038,630
Difference: 6,539,682
"killerboyo1 today at 20:29
(circular mail)
As you all have known in 2009, we announced we will be going to war against [ally]ALW[/ally] to assist our allies [ally]K.W.C.[/ally]
also check this (last 7days)
http://www.twstats.com/en20/index.php?page=achievements&display=pennoblelose
3 out of 5 enoblement lossers are from prime if this continue it will be a nice sight to see
http://www.twstats.com/en20/index.php?page=achievements&display=tennoblelose
and as a tribe as well!
Obviously if you consider the tribes individually, Prime would be at the top in losses and amount of players in the top "villages loss" list. On the other hand it significantly changes if you consider the whole alliance as one entity. Mathematically speaking, your post is senseless and void of significance. If not, following your example from your 1st statement, I can just as easily say "Prime" only has 1 of its tribes and allies in the top 5, whilst the alliance has 3. See what I did there? :icon_rolleyes:
that post almost made no sense to me....
what are you babbling about Op.
the only thing joining does is show how they are winning village over the alliance when there not there winning villages over kiltom/tomtom if i remember correctly its mostly tomtom. what little lead they did have is dwindling quite quickly so mashing stats together may make them look a bit better in the moment but doesn't discribe how the wars are going for them.
if fact mashing them is misleading as if you looked right now they look to be leading by a small margin. when you separate you can see they are hitting tomtom and kiltom in the northwest. the rest of prime as a tribe are losing though.
but hey maybe thats a win to you... all i know if things continue this way prime will fold alot sooner then Christmas time.
study world war 2 Germany took over most of Europe yet still lost the war and alliance is stronger than one individual and it sucks for you all but you tribe has lost the most
study world war 2
The ONLY thing that could be compared is if Prime (Germany) attacked BSM (Russia) all of a sudden and broke the NAP.
correct prime is germany attacked the world
berry/hefty created usa
and yea sounds good bsm russia
how many more things you want genrally an example needs to only be right once
Err what? Rah jiggy blah meh niff jiggy? :S
Translation anyone for me to post an answer to it?