waterdrinker
Guest
ahh, too bad. That would be a useful tool indeed.
ahh, too bad. That would be a useful tool indeed.
DeletedUser53550
Guest
Certainly would have been. I've got a few cages to rattle (in W7) and that information would have been priceless.
DeletedUser
Guest
Your right i made this the day before, i forgot to add his last 4 ennoblements, otherwise pretty accurate.
DeletedUser
Guest
No, they are that bad.
DeletedUser
Guest
No its still wrong as the number of villages doesn't add up correctly aswell
836+1044+672-40= 2512
Only 50 villages apparently gone missing there.
giantsfrey
Guest
its klomp--you can just assume everything he says has a +/-100% margin of error
DeletedUser
Guest
Conquers and villages are something completely different.
Conquers => 836+1044+116+672+40= 2708 (difference 4)
Villages => 2708-116-40= 2552 + 10 (retaken)= 2562
note: There's always a slight margin of error, all add it up in his favour.
Last edited by a moderator:
giantsfrey
Guest
i like your sig, klomp. you should check out w18... it will REALLY piss you off
DeletedUser53550
Guest
Number of barbarians taken, according to TWstats, is 835
The 3rd easiest number to check (behind Conquers and Villages) yet you somehow managed to get wrong. How Bad Are You? If you can't do the simple things right, then how are "we" supposed to believe any other numbers you care to produce; although I do find it touching that you spent time making up the numbers. You're my TW stalker!
DeletedUser
Guest
Added enough villages in your favour to correct mistakes like this.
Anything you can find are details in the margins, doesn't make you look any better.
Last edited by a moderator:
DeletedUser
Guest
Where?
DeletedUser
Guest
I know what you've done wrong i think.
Because for the conquers you added the 40 that hes lost in. You need to -80 to find out how many villages he has. Currently you are not counting to lost ones as you added them to the conquers and only took them away for villages when really you need to take them away again.
Conquers= 2668(gains+self) +40(losses)
Villages= 2708 (gains + losses+self)-40(losses)-116(self)=(gains)
When infact it should be (gains)-(losses).
DeletedUser53550
Guest
I checked one figure (the 3rd easiest one to check) and it was wrong. I've not bothered to check your numbers since you couldn't get the simple one right. I trust TWstats :icon_biggrin:
You fail at English, you fail at Maths and you fail at TW.
How Bad Are You?
I recommend people go to www.KlompStats.com/en7/index for more vital TW world 7 stats. On there you can find the real FxF vs. -WE- war stats (it clearly shows that FxF is winning) and the revelation that Jake is only 2nd in the total points (behind someone called Klomp107) and Laz is 2nd in ODA (behind someone called Klomp107).
There are Lies, damn lies and Klomp's Statistics..
waterdrinker
Guest
Yea, at least -WE- will actually win their world.
An alliance of four tribes winning a world is the biggest load of crap I have ever heard.
giantsfrey
Guest
stop trying to be our friend, water
waterdrinker
Guest
Just stating facts. Only one tribe can be victorious.
DeletedUser53550
Guest
Amen - In this forum you are preaching to the choir. Look for one of Chopper's replies for my comment on W18..
torflek
Guest
torflek
Guest
How's the war with those barbarian villages going? Are they fighting back yet?
DeletedUser37109
Guest
see comment for relevant xafilah comment
