DeletedUser
Guest
I've got a question! You quoted
As being your credible proof. This "higher power from the north" you surmise to be BD.
paj and co is obviously pajuno and Phoenx, correct? Based on this quote, they also wanted you gone? They also want to fight you? Where exactly are they then? This is Pajuno's post in the other thread...He clearly wants you gone :icon_rolleyes:
If one half of the quote is already suspect, I wouldn't try to derive proof from the other half.
This is the best proof you had? I'm disappointed. It looks like you're desperately looking hard to find a so-called alliance, and are willing to see it anywhere. You take the smallest comment as your "proof" despite everything that's already been said. A bit bull-headed, but meh, I guess that's your "right"
Actually, it was known from the R.Inc war that BD had PA's in [CRY]. We've been quite frank about who are allies are this entire world. I guess BloodHood can't help being paranoid, but, is this the action of allies?
Side 1:
Tribes: BD
Players:
Side 2:
Tribes: [CRY]
Players:
Timeframe: Last month
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 11
Side 2: 4
Difference: 7
Not a war, but simply expanding. Do you usually expand into your allies?
I believe we have denied being a part of any coalition, or attempting to gather a coalition. The fact that other tribes have seized upon this opportunity is your problem, not ours.
frazeryeah said:now, i cannot say who, but a higher power from the north wants HAM gone, and paj and co also" and "nyway, we have a very strong relationship, with this higher power from the north ( repete this and i will be very very angry ) but we are going to work with them, to delete HAM
As being your credible proof. This "higher power from the north" you surmise to be BD.
paj and co is obviously pajuno and Phoenx, correct? Based on this quote, they also wanted you gone? They also want to fight you? Where exactly are they then? This is Pajuno's post in the other thread...He clearly wants you gone :icon_rolleyes:
If one half of the quote is already suspect, I wouldn't try to derive proof from the other half.
This is the best proof you had? I'm disappointed. It looks like you're desperately looking hard to find a so-called alliance, and are willing to see it anywhere. You take the smallest comment as your "proof" despite everything that's already been said. A bit bull-headed, but meh, I guess that's your "right"
Yes, that means he was lying.
I claimed that BD and CRY were allied. This was known since the R.inc war. Where you double teamed R.inc. Fraseryeah then claims it in this conversation. So now he was lying and I was wrong...
hmmm
Actually, it was known from the R.Inc war that BD had PA's in [CRY]. We've been quite frank about who are allies are this entire world. I guess BloodHood can't help being paranoid, but, is this the action of allies?
Side 1:
Tribes: BD
Players:
Side 2:
Tribes: [CRY]
Players:
Timeframe: Last month
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 11
Side 2: 4
Difference: 7
Not a war, but simply expanding. Do you usually expand into your allies?
Which still shows I'm right. [CRY] organised a coalition upon HAM!!!. You denied any coalition at all. You claimed was war was because of sniping and recruiting. But if Fraser was planning this war with BD involved before even anything happened, doesn't look good on BD does it?
I believe we have denied being a part of any coalition, or attempting to gather a coalition. The fact that other tribes have seized upon this opportunity is your problem, not ours.