And once again with the personal attacks on me, Richard :icon_neutral: My only flaw as a blogger was that I was unable to release the weekly editions which were required. It is in the contract that weekly blogs are a must, and while a lot of current and past bloggers skip past that rule totally guilt-free, I could not.
In essence you are saying that just because I wasn't the perfect blogger (in your opinion) that I have no right to criticize other blogs? In what universe is that fair? I have just as much right as anyone to give constructive criticism where it is due. I don't see why you are defending my posts on a personal level when everything I have said to Ulti was strictly objective. In fact, I was one of the people vouching that he be hired for W22. I was the one that gave him a good recommendation. There is no reason for me to now sabotage that and I never intended to. I was just being honest. The only excuses for him that you've made are 'well maybe he's not the official blogger' and 'blogging takes a lot out of a person' - first argument was discredited and as for the second one, you know your job when you sign up for it. No one claimed it to be easy, but at the very least try to meet the requirements in the contract. Telling us straight up that he'll only be posting twice a month does not look like trying to meet the requirements to me.
Also, I never told him to quit. I told him to step it up and encouraged him to try harder next time.