DeletedUser78112
Guest
#Rizz4Prezz
We just feel bad that they wasted their time making a nice account to have it dumped, but hey who are we to have feelings right?
Plz explain y its more acceptable to ruin a tribe, that has 20+ accounts, by being a mole and the enemies tool from the inside and completely unacceptable and immoral to use an inside man to ruin an account that was or going to work sginst the tribe from the inside. That's the story ryt or am I missing sumthing?for your sake fool i hope this is pnp and you dont actually believe this, coz if you actually think sabotaging an account you play on is acceptable for any reason then you just dont get it
The owner of the account sent the troops away therefore it is legal. Just because 1 player disagreed with the decision does not change the fact it is legal
Logging onto someone elses account to do it is against the rules and should not be tolorated but logging into an account you play and sending your own troops out is allowed otherwise everyone here has broken the rules.
Yes it was mean of the player but it was nothing worse than what was being planned to happen.
Plz explain y its more acceptable to ruin a tribe, that has 20+ accounts, by being a mole and the enemies tool from the inside and completely unacceptable and immoral to use an inside man to ruin an account that was or going to work sginst the tribe from the inside. That's the story ryt or am I missing sumthing?
Ps
I find it funny that u guys, NAM supporters, are outraged by a player betraying the account they play in but nothing wrong with a player betraying a tribe that is the collective work of a group. But then agaiN u guys where coming out swinging in the defense for using the word retard in a derogatory way and when you get called on it hurled abuse and stopped spamming that thread... Maybe u need to step back from the pnp.
Royal claims the account was going to do more than just leave the tribe. And disbanding a tribe is not the only way to ruin a tribeIF what RoyalE claim is true and the player intended to leave the tribe, then that is hardly ruining the tribe. Ruining the tribe would be to take the sit of the duke and hit the disband button, but any player is entitled to leave if they are not happy.
If RoyalE was to kick the account and noble it and have a fair fight that is also perfectly acceptable, but using such a low move just to get some free villages is an awful thing to do.
I find it funny that u guys, RoyalE supporters, are outraged by a player leaveing a tribe but nothing wrong with hijacking an account from a player that has spent months and a lot of his own money making it a top 10 account. But then agaiN u guys where coming out swinging in the defense for making light hearted joke of a serious air disaster and when you get called on it hurled abuse and stopped spamming that thread... Maybe u need to step back from the pnp.
^ I think both tribes have equally been guilty of being dicks in PnP, but we enjoy the banter. You guys seem outraged by it, maybe if it bothers you guys that much then put a lid on it yourself. That would give you a platform to at least make your argument heard.
#GoNAM
Royal claims the account was going to do more than just leave the tribe. And disbanding a tribe is not the only way to ruin a tribe
Wow that showed me... I will say that if u go back to the thread u will see a post where the 1 playEr who made the light hearted joke apologized. But this post is obviously not going to get u guys to man up and actually apologize for being insensetive and such.
True but RoyalE has not called players who t leave the tribe bad. Royal believed the account was going to sabotage tribe so the tribe sabotaged it.90% of recruits ingame, including both RoyalE and NAM have come from players leaving other tribes. So why are you so fast to call someone a bad person for wanting to leave RoyalE? If ofc this was the case.If a player does not want to be part of a tribe then they can leave.
Never said RoyalE was the shining light here just that the 1 guy who you called out apologized and stopped can't say the same 4 u.Man up and see both sides are as bad as each other on the externals, we just don't cry about it
True but RoyalE has not called players who t leave the tribe bad. Royal believed the account was going to sabotage tribe so the tribe sabotaged it.
so the tribe sabotaged it..
You keep going on about the account going to sabotage the tribe would you care to go into more detail on this please?
Check pg7 of this thread. I'm not in RoyalE by the way just couldn't stand reading some post and saying nothing.
I wanted to ask, how often did the Contra player(s) in RoyalE exchange information on activities and internal situations with their counterparts in NAM say three weeks to war being declared.
Originally Posted by zuks
so the tribe sabotaged it..
By fooling the owner into thinking he was going to have a player help him but instead ruining the account sick one.. We might have a way with words, but this is something we would never sink so low as to do.
Almost never - krieger wasn't very nice to any of them from the start so they kinda got excluded and came back to us (sun)
^You fooled a tribe to think you where going to play the End game differently but instead turned the war into a poop throwing match with a lot of hate dumped on Kreiger. NAM and RoyalE had a long term alliance you could have dropped the alliance and had a tasteful pnp about how u couldn't let the world end in a merge. Instead we have the last three threads. Plz at a l8r date come back and read through them mAybe u wiLl fill differently about how some represented themselves.
Ps from ur post u give the impression its ok for a player to screw a tribe but not the other way around. Don't knoW if this is what u R trying to say on not.
Almost then, If he wasn't very nice then it's more likely that this would of been shared along with other things (nod)
Almost as contradictory as I am tonight, how refreshing!