Actually, I have been on the losing side, I became duke on w74 when we were losing hardcore. We were the side that got hammered and lost loads of territory and was as far behind as NOOBS are in war stats right now. So if BGR turns it around with you lot on w93 then great he deserves every accolade - He hasnt and he just turns up and chats to a few of you and aims to drag the world out via barb nobling. People who have actually been in that losing situation like you are now knows how impossible it is or seems to turn it around.
Most would nominate their duke/favorite player - like the kimkhan vote is a total joke. NOOBS are making a mockery of this whole thing. Just go play your accounts on w93 and lose with a bit of noise rather than getting steamrolled. Voting for eachother here wont fix anything in game.
Again, what's with the unnecessarily spiteful exaggerated prose? I'm literally just trying to have an interesting conversation about the qualities of leadership lol
Well clearly W74 demonstrates you are an excellent leader but it does not imply Grim is not. Every situation is different and it is my personal belief that a lot of factors outside of Grim's control have caused noobs to be in their current predicament.
And I wouldn't personally go around defining the awards as if it were solid fact - that is up to every individual to formulate. It's quite clear to see that you are very results orientated person. I am not - I like to value dedication and effort more heavily - there are plenty of great historical leaders who have had the arses handed to them in combat. For me, Grim has more than fulfilled the requirements. There may be others as well (and that's why this thread is even here), but unfortunately I am not all seeing, and neither are you.
Just to clarify (although I know I'm sinking rather low with this) there's no bloody conspiracy to get our members winning these awards and I'm fully aware it will not change the course of in game play.
I nominated him because I want to highlight his achievements, not so that he wins 1000pp. As for the kimkhan vote, the only reason I wouldn't see that as a justified nomination is because of the weak reasons provided. If they were better, who's to say that he's not a great leader just because he leads a smaller tribe.