FORK's fatal error.

[DeletedUser]

The issue at hand is that Rampants didnt set anyone as a sitter until well after villages started to be nobled. We then got the sit and sorted a few things out.

No sah, no one else talked about inactives.

Me waits for the obligatory post about Rampants losing villages. Huge difference here though, Rampants wasn't active and/or posting crap in the externals about his awesomeness.

Dear leader seemed to talk about it plenty, sah. Might wanna check that out.

We didn't hit inactives. Nobled HH, streak1, archangel, and bgeorge3. None inactive.

[spoil]nothome (488|192) K14 9,876 ckdba [FORK] nothome [FORK] 2012-04-13 05:30:04
nothome (493|183) K14 9,740 ckdba [FORK] nothome [FORK] 2012-04-13 05:16:55
nothome (483|207) K24 9,876 ckdba [FORK] nothome [FORK] 2012-04-12 20:05:26
nothome (498|211) K24 9,735 ckdba [FORK] nothome [FORK] 2012-04-12 14:47:13
nothome (491|183) K14 9,735 ckdba [FORK] nothome [FORK] 2012-04-12 13:33:42
nothome (451|161) K14 9,735 ckdba [FORK] nothome [FORK] 2012-04-12 09:40:09
nothome (490|184) K14 9,747 ckdba [FORK] nothome [FORK] 2012-04-12 05:29:40
nothome (490|189) K14 9,735 ckdba [FORK] nothome [FORK] 2012-04-11 12:34:29
nothome (491|188) K14 9,876 ckdba [FORK] nothome [FORK] 2012-04-11 11:03:52
nothome (497|184) K14 9,852 ckdba [FORK] nothome [FORK] 2012-04-11 05:55:13
nothome (492|188) K14 9,876 ckdba [FORK] nothome [FORK] 2012-04-11 04:10:38
nothome (490|210) K24 9,745 ckdba [FORK] nothome [FORK] 2012-04-10 10:16:15
nothome (491|211) K24 9,888 ckdba [FORK] nothome [FORK] 2012-04-10 09:34:46
nothome (483|210) K24 9,735 ckdba [FORK] nothome [FORK] 2012-04-10 08:14:05[/spoil]

Nope, not inactive, just being internalled.

[spoil]Fight! (402|295) K24 9,764 Rampants X [FORK] iTzBobby [FORK] 2012-04-15 10:42:48
Fight! (411|308) K34 9,764 Rampants X [FORK] pressstart [FORK] 2012-04-15 02:16:20
«K24-SW» (408|285) K24 9,764 Rampants X [FORK] iTzBobby [FORK] 2012-04-14 20:36:14
«K24-SW» (405|286) K24 9,764 Rampants X [FORK] iTzBobby [FORK] 2012-04-14 05:34:42
«K24-SW» (404|282) K24 9,764 Rampants X [FORK] iTzBobby [FORK] 2012-04-14 04:50:56
«K24-SW» (412|281) K24 9,764 Rampants X [FORK] iTzBobby [FORK] 2012-04-14 02:10:05
«K24-SW» (413|283) K24 9,764 Rampants X [FORK] iTzBobby [FORK] 2012-04-14 00:24:51
«K23-SE» (399|272) K23 9,764 Rampants X [FORK] iTzBobby [FORK] 2012-04-14 00:10:12
FORK IS COMING (409|306) K34 9,764 Rampants X [FORK] pressstart [FORK] 2012-04-13 15:35:26
0294 (421|289) K24 9,797 Rampants X [FORK] morbidzero [FORK] 2012-04-13 09:57:29
«K24-SW» (415|287) K24 9,764 Rampants X [FORK] iTzBobby [FORK] 2012-04-13 09:34:20
«K24-SW» (414|289) K24 9,764 Rampants X [FORK] iTzBobby [FORK] 2012-04-13 06:49:50
0293 (440|289) K24 9,764 Rampants X [FORK] morbidzero [FORK] 2012-04-13 06:35:11
FORK IS COMING (408|307) K34 9,764 Rampants X [FORK] pressstart [FORK] 2012-04-13 00:30:33
0292 (435|287) K24 9,775 Rampants X [FORK] morbidzero [FORK] 2012-04-12 11:11:39
0291 (442|281) K24 9,775 Rampants X [FORK] morbidzero [FORK] 2012-04-12 09:49:04
«K24-SW» (413|287) K24 9,775 Rampants X [FORK] iTzBobby [FORK] 2012-04-12 05:41:42
«K24-SW» (417|284) K24 9,783 Rampants X [FORK] iTzBobby [FORK] 2012-04-12 04:28:02
0290 (439|285) K24 9,764 Rampants X [FORK] morbidzero [FORK] 2012-04-12 01:07:44
«K24-SW» (401|274) K24 9,764 Rampants X [FORK] iTzBobby [FORK] 2012-04-11 13:14:45[/spoil]

Your dear leader decided to post that Rampants X losing villages wasn't a big deal before you guys started internalling. But no, he's not inactive, right?

Yeah, glad you check stats Rawr.

 

[DeletedUser]

oh and wait he hates fork aswell because they removed him from SeabassQQ

Well technically not removed, they gained control the account again after I set it to delete lol

And hate is such a strong word ...

As for u6s5l, dude you are starting to sound a little mad there :icon_rolleyes: The solution to your problem is simple, noble more Fork villas

 

[DeletedUser]

he clearly can't, notice he ignored all the fact's in my post and only picked out one thing in there. :icon_rolleyes:

he is obviously trying to fight a losing battle, getting his butt whooped and has to re-arrangetime frame to make him feel good and feel like he is actually doing something worthwhile :lol:

your tribal OP 14 caps in what a week? with 6 fork cap's = 8

my 26 caps on 3 different players in 4 days? with no recap's = you fail ass

seem's you have a thing or two still to learn young padawan, sit back and enjoy the show clown.

 

[DeletedUser]

Mad? No. I'm a moderator for another world, AKA a robot. I don't have emotions. But I do have a lot of sarcasm. That's the first thing they program into me.

Speaking of sarcasm, you're a genius Stoned Temple Pilot. Absolute genius. Why didn't we think of it before?

Rawr Mode, you literally didn't respond to me going over everything you said. Every last bit. Why am I not surprised?

Your 26 caps came from an inactive, 1 cap off of one player, and another player who I don't really know too much about the situation from. If that's something for you to say "go me" about, then say it all you like.

Gonna ignore it this time too ?

 

[DeletedUser]

Mad? No. I'm a moderator for another world, AKA a robot. I don't have emotions. But I do have a lot of sarcasm. That's the first thing they program into me.

Speaking of sarcasm, you're a genius Stoned Temple Pilot. Absolute genius. Why didn't we think of it before?

Rawr Mode, you literally didn't respond to me going over everything you said. Every last bit. Why am I not surprised?

Your 26 caps came from an inactive, 1 cap off of one player, and another player who I don't really know too much about the situation from. If that's something for you to say "go me" about, then say it all you like.

Gonna ignore it this time too ?

funny deb was begging for somebody to sit while i was attacking her given i had the skype log's, she was alive and kicking.

i nobled 1 from dno which i know he was active and i talked to hero the entire time i was nobling him, and glenmex didn't quit till after i took his cluster over there to which you guys quickly internalled him :icon_rolleyes:

not my fault i catch you guy's with your pants down.

so talk all that shit you want about inactive's, i kick your bum more so solo then you guys do as a whole, how does that make you feel? MAD step your game up or get the heck off my world.

best stat's ever LOL @ my sarcasm

 

[DeletedUser]

Uh, cool story about Deb bro. You still talking about that?

Good job, a noble off Dno. Pro status:

[spoil]Side 1:
Players: INCOMING FAKES
Side 2:
Tribes: FORK, Fork2

Timeframe: 11/04/2012 00:00:00 to 15/04/2012 11:48:17

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1
Side 2: 0
Difference: 1

Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 9,878
Side 2: 0
Difference: 9,878

[/spoil]

OMG OMG OMG he took 1 whole active village from an active player he's wrecking Fork oh my gawd oh my gawd he kicks butt so hard omg omg omg he does better than 90% of Fork omg omg omg.

And yeah, sure. Whatever you say about Glenmex. No matter what I say, he's going to be "active". Even if you only took 5 villages before he began getting internalled. He must've seen 5 villages lost, logged out and never returned. Never mind that you did the same thing 20 days before, and he didn't quit, but the second time you did it, he must've abandoned all hope and quit in the face of another 5 losses. Absolutely, you must be right. But Rampants X? Nah...he was never active.

There's a solution to your problem Rawr. If you want me off the world forums, quit posting. When you quit posting, I'll quit posting. That is, unless someone equally oblivious decides to open their mouth.

'Til then, you're stuck with lil ol' me .

Edit: Anyone else notice that he hasn't yet shown me where we said 14 conquers was amazing, for his justification of comparing us to what faaaaark said?

What a surprise, another ignored, genuine request.

 

[DeletedUser]

all i hear is excuse's to be honest, just face it your a baddie mate, baddie always gonna be bad, even bad at running your mouth it seems which is surprising as much as you run it.

everybody you say we is somehow 'inactive' perhaps try using another line, oh wait you've only been here a week so giving these things happened a few week's ago, how would you know if they was active or not, wait that's right your full of shit rofl and i have quoted where you said you had only been on the account 2 day's.

 

[DeletedUser]

24 hours:
[SPOIL]Side 1:
Tribes: FORK, Fork2
Side 2:
Tribes: Bunny., Rabbit

Timeframe: Last 24 hours

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 16
Side 2: 0
Difference: 16[/SPOIL]

48 hours:
[SPOIL]Side 1:
Tribes: FORK, Fork2
Side 2:
Tribes: Bunny., Rabbit

Timeframe: Last 48 hours

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 32
Side 2: 4
Difference: 28[/SPOIL]

 

[DeletedUser]

all i hear is excuse's to be honest, just face it your a baddie mate, baddie always gonna be bad, even bad at running your mouth it seems which is surprising as much as you run it.

everybody you say we is somehow 'inactive' perhaps try using another line, oh wait you've only been here a week so giving these things happened a few week's ago, how would you know if they was active or not, wait that's right your full of shit rofl and i have quoted where you said you had only been on the account 2 day's.

I use twstats.

It's not all that hard. I'm sorry that you haven't figured out how to use it yet.

 

[DeletedUser]

Speaking of sarcasm, you're a genius Stoned Temple Pilot. Absolute genius. Why didn't we think of it before?

Thud. Reality hit huh ? :icon_rolleyes:

I use twstats

So does Faaaaark it appears, his argument seems to be betterer than yours ...

 

[DeletedUser]

Faaaaark uses it without background using the many other facets of twstats. I use them.

Better is relative :icon_wink:.

 

[DeletedUser]

I use twstats.

It's not all that hard. I'm sorry that you haven't figured out how to use it yet.

sure you do cupcake, been here less then a week and yet you still think you know the in's and out's of this world already, how foolish of you.

point is you guy's tried to gangbang us out, it failed now you are losing. infact MANIC never won a single war with out gangbanging somebody, true story.

yea yea i know you guy's are Bunny. but giving this your first big war, only thing i have to judge you by is your history and you know what they say, history repeats itself.

 

[DeletedUser]

I think you've said the same thing 30 times now, and it's not getting any more correct the more you say it.

 

[DeletedUser]

There's a solution to your problem Rawr. If you want me off the world forums, quit posting. When you quit posting, I'll quit posting. That is, unless someone equally oblivious decides to open their mouth.

'Til then, you're stuck with lil ol' me .

I think you've said the same thing 30 times now, and it's not getting any more correct the more you say it.

you mean the fact of how correct that statement is? you stop posting when i stop posting but yet i was the one to respond to you, sounds like an oxymoron.

as i've showed time and time again and others have shown how full of it you are, just because you have 'mod' status doesn't make you creditable.

at the very least you have been here a week or so? so how do you claim these big miraculously changes in Bunny. especially the ones that have been fighting this war from the very beginning. when the tribe is made almost entirely of the same players that was losing before :icon_confused:

i'm simply pointing out the flaws and contradicting comments in your post seeing as you tend to do that quite often.

 

[DeletedUser]

Faaaaark uses it without background using the many other facets of twstats. I use them.

Facets ? Meh, it is tribalwars, conquers, no matter 'who' they are from, matter. Nothing else does, in your position especially :icon_wink:

Get some then come back and say something :lol:

Hint: if you are not arguing from a position of power your arguments have to get a whole lot better than they are

 

[DeletedUser]

Your last post made 0 sense. Care to try rephrasing it so I can understand and respond to it? I'll try to respond to what I did understand.

Yes, stop responding and I'll stop responding. It's not a difficult concept to grasp, I thought.

I've never said anything about being a moderator, that's you. Here, I'm just a player. I thought you'd grasped that too. Apparently not.

I don't claim the changes. I don't know what you mean by that, even.

Stoned Temple Pilot, what does a position of power have to do with an argument? The content of the argument is what you should be looking at. But yeah, conquers are conquers. Woohoo? I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy. When it's Rampants X losing villages they said it's not something to be proud of. Alright, so don't be proud of these conquers. I'm just repeating their sentiment.

Strange, I've yet to see Rawr Mode flame you for not being on the world either. Wonder why.

 

[DeletedUser]

Your last post made 0 sense. Care to try rephrasing it so I can understand and respond to it? I'll try to respond to what I did understand.

Yes, stop responding and I'll stop responding. It's not a difficult concept to grasp, I thought.

I've never said anything about being a moderator, that's you. Here, I'm just a player. I thought you'd grasped that too. Apparently not.

I don't claim the changes. I don't know what you mean by that, even.

Stoned Temple Pilot, what does a position of power have to do with an argument? The content of the argument is what you should be looking at. But yeah, conquers are conquers. Woohoo? I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy. When it's Rampants X losing villages they said it's not something to be proud of. Alright, so don't be proud of these conquers. I'm just repeating their sentiment.

Strange, I've yet to see Rawr Mode flame you for not being on the world either. Wonder why.

my last post made lots of sense but then again you try to act smartier then you actually are so im sure you have trouble grasping that 'pun intended'. in other words, you try to act smartier then your actual intellligence.

^^ old saying, look it up.

asfar as your 'mod' status, you think your shit dont stink. so you can get right off that high horse you rode in on. that's why i say that, you think you know everything mate but you know so very little. that is why i call you a clown.

why would i flame him for not being on the world, last i checked he use to be FORK if im not mistaken as did Unreformed Pirate, you mad cause im picking on you? :lol:

get some thicker skin child. alot meanier people then me. :icon_rolleyes:

 

[DeletedUser]

I just responded to your post, and you didn't say a word.

I'm aware I can be wrong. But when facts back me up, I'll post them. Got a problem? Get some thicker skin :icon_wink:.

So he's not on the world and doesn't know what's going on currently as opposed to before? Well, I was in the world before, am I a credible source now?

 

[DeletedUser]

I just responded to your post, and you didn't say a word.

I'm aware I can be wrong. But when facts back me up, I'll post them. Got a problem? Get some thicker skin :icon_wink:.

So he's not on the world and doesn't know what's going on currently as opposed to before? Well, I was in the world before, am I a credible source now?

i dont think he even replied to anything of the current event's nor did he brag about the stat's, he stood back and watched your post and mine and found mine more believable and logical. who knows, i can't really speak for him.

changing the time frame = fact's? fact's are MANIC was winning the war, when i got burned then the war turned in FORK's favor & then Honor got involved and made it worse on you guy's. that pretty much sum's it up. you guy's did have a good thing going for you back when river and i was still around and a few other members that have left but when a few of ex-manic leaders left and said they was done and agreed with me, even after i had fought agaisnt them in the end. that pretty much says what it is.

needless to say your duke isnt even defending the incoming's she has right now or so the word goes, so yeah i stand by my previous statements that you guys suck :icon_rolleyes:

 

[DeletedUser]

So again, I'll ask; are you going to tell him to leave, or are you going to rescind your statements about me not knowing anything about the world? Don't dodge it this time.

I didn't say changing the time frame was a fact, but the stats that I posted were facts. What you read into them is not a fact, but is usually fairly obvious.

You seem to think you are single-handedly responsible for Bunny. not winning the overall stats. Alrighty then.

Or so the word goes? You sound confident