DeletedUser
Guest
see thats ur problem u think its a defeat taking villages well i just killed off tons of ur troops which in result wont give u alot to defend those new homes u have and means more for meeeeee in the end keep playing that way
A village is a village
Maybe next time you'll think twice about keeping useless accounts for the sake of points aye?
What do you guys say about these stats?
while you guys are killing our inactives in stead of us
we are just growing bigger and bigger
pardon me n00b? they are apart of the triebs collective villages. has nothign to do about points... just becuase FENX noobs didnt want to join you so you killed them off.... And the rest of the world watched you take the core. You are now having your challenge to a war, lets try to keep this crap outta publics and on the field mk?. :icon_evil:
I have 1 question specifically for Wiz.
Why would you put a bunch of inactives into your premier tribe.
and 1 comment
We are attacking S2ORM - We attack the places where we think you are most vulnerable to get a foothold in your territory - Once the villages have built enough troops we will use them to noble more active players more easily... It is not a crime to attack inactive players in a tribe you are at war with.
Question for wizdom,
How many inactives are in your tribe??
In the war you started with virgin and underworld you stated that we only ever nobled your inactive players and now you have stated that apart from 37 villages kinky have only nobled inactive members of your tribe.
How is your tribe still standing if it is full of inactive players and if you hve so many why are you keeping them in the tribe??Is it so you can come out with so called facts and figures that you can twst in your favour?or is it you don't want to drop your tribes points by kicking your inactives?
Question for wizdom,
How many inactives are in your tribe??
In the war you started with virgin and underworld you stated that we only ever nobled your inactive players and now you have stated that apart from 37 villages kinky have only nobled inactive members of your tribe.
How is your tribe still standing if it is full of inactive players and if you hve so many why are you keeping them in the tribe??Is it so you can come out with so called facts and figures that you can twst in your favour?or is it you don't want to drop your tribes points by kicking your inactives?
at guess ~80% ennoblements by kinky on inactives
but this cant be discredited as a valid war tactic i guess. And im curious why S²ORM has let these go seemingly so easily even if they are inactive?
I guess what i'm saying is theres a slim chance this thread could be more than just propeganda :icon_eek:
I'm getting sick of everyone mentioning inactives as the reason for poor war statistics.
Its the leadership of the tribe's responsibility to clear out people who aren't willing to make the time commitment to tribalwars. So even if they are inactive, they are still members of the tribe viable targets in a war. If they are so unactive and such a liability, they shouldn't be in the tribe in the first place!
I just don't understand how every losing tribe seems to go 99% inactive when the war stats roll out.
Sorry for getting a little worked up there. Its nothing against you Azi, I know you were just mentioning it and specifically said tribes shouldnt be discredited for attacking inactives. I'm just sick of reading this excusse by a lot of other people.
almost 3 weeks
more then 4 weeks