I never blame anyone for thinking anything. You are entitled to your thoughts and from a RL perspective, whether I agree with what you say or not, I'll defend till my last breath your right to voice your thoughts.
However, I have a different side of the story to present and I did so.
You gave what you thought hapenned, and I stated my side. The reader decides who to believe. I'm not stomping your right to an opinion, I'm giving my own (different) opinion on the same matter.
@ Staben : I was not present ingame during the stage you are referring to.
Hence you were redirected to the person in charge of the tribe at that stage.
On skype when peter forwarded your proposal to me, there was absolutely no mention of Kinky dropping its current diplomacy.
If there was, I would be quick to rule this out of the question. According to your post now, the effective Kings proposal was a Kinky-Garuda-Kings three way alliance and that Kinky back stab both VVV and ESL in the back.
Anyone who knows me (Iamgreen included btw), that theres about zero chance of this happening.
This really underlines what I've been saying all along. That those who accuse Kinky of backstabbing her allies are basically wishful thinkers who want Kinky to backstab her allies.
Because those people would benefit from such a move.