One Last Shot...
Contributing Poster
- Reaction score
- 1,552
Our wrongs? We mentioned that we were not completely innocent in our declaration against Undy. Nice try Elmo, but it's all in the original declaration thread for you :icon_wink:
Agency never went for you, never intended to and never had interest in going for you. So no - Agency never "gunned" for you. Nice try with the ego inflation though :icon_redface:
My point? Undy did nothing but provoke Agency to the point of insanity for the entire time before Zeah took over. And the simple truth is, nothing was fixable by that point unless Undy made some big internal changes and some dismissals off their own back, without being pushed by Agency to do so (as us doing so would have caused the war we were up until then trying to avoid).
We cannot be held responsible for Undy's action or rather, inaction.
You are trying to make Agency look bad for Undy backstabbing our diplomatic agreement and so terminating what already ceased to exist at Undy's own decision (not the leadership at that time, but the entirety of the tribe bordering Agency).
Just accept that your tribe failed because of its inability to do anything but play self-centred.
Undy lost, Agency won. Baibai Elmo.
Fact is we tried to make amends which is aslittle as I can say for you guys.
On that note I had more people gunning for me then anybody else in this world, Insane, PoW, Org, TROY and Agency..
Agency never went for you, never intended to and never had interest in going for you. So no - Agency never "gunned" for you. Nice try with the ego inflation though :icon_redface:
As far as your "Fact" goes, something doesn't add up.
1. Was Magwyn kicked as per the agreement which was the foundation of the entire diplomatic relationship? No.
2. Did the Danish group get kicked for stacking the player Undy promised they would not stack? No.
3. Did Undy give back all the cross-nobles in the TROY op of villages they knew Agency were going for and agreed to leave for us? Not even close.
4. Did Undy make amends for merging in an account to their tribe when they saw it was under attack from Agency and deliberately attack Agency from it? No.
5. Did Undy leadership break diplomatic agreements by posting certain aspects publicly after agreeing to not do so? No.
6. Did Undy leadership ever treat Agency as equal or their superiors (which everybody knew full well was the case throughout - Agency went in to the relationship knowing they didn't need it and that Undy desperately did)? No.
My point? Undy did nothing but provoke Agency to the point of insanity for the entire time before Zeah took over. And the simple truth is, nothing was fixable by that point unless Undy made some big internal changes and some dismissals off their own back, without being pushed by Agency to do so (as us doing so would have caused the war we were up until then trying to avoid).
We cannot be held responsible for Undy's action or rather, inaction.
You are trying to make Agency look bad for Undy backstabbing our diplomatic agreement and so terminating what already ceased to exist at Undy's own decision (not the leadership at that time, but the entirety of the tribe bordering Agency).
Just accept that your tribe failed because of its inability to do anything but play self-centred.
Undy lost, Agency won. Baibai Elmo.
Last edited: