baseball2009star
Guest
and they all have a tendancy to blame us for stuff they do theirselves
Hey Rhand, FYI Theirselves isn't a word!
and they all have a tendancy to blame us for stuff they do theirselves
Hey Rhand, FYI Theirselves isn't a word!
I can recall countless times many of us asking PZA to start internalling those inactives doing nothing, not responding to anything etc .. But it all comes down to his image of Legion, he would've had to kick 30% of them, which he didn't seem to think was right (lol Losing the #1 spot)
You might be on to something . hehe i'm not english speaking, I tend to make up new words now and then ^^.
And richard, I don't come here to contribute, I come here to whine at ur whining. That's all I'm here for. (/me eagerly awaits the whining response at this. (No really, there's no need at all to respond to stupid comments I write, I don't take much seriously, and we could offcourse have the next 3 pages about why I shouldn't have said you were whiners, and why i'm a hypocrite and a bigger whiner and I have no right at all, but there is really no point, I'll just keep lolling back and provoking you further, so save yourself the trouble and move on to the next issue to whine about, cause all you'll prove in the end is that I'm annoying, pointless and disturbed, and you care to much about what people think))
My reasons for not kicking these people has nothing to do with loosing the number 1 spot. And quite frankly, it is never something you are going to be able to understand just as you couldn't whilst in LEGION, so I'm not even going to bother trying explain it to you as you are too narrow minded to even try and understand what I will say. Ask Richard, he'll fill you in and something tells me, he does understand my reasoning. :icon_wink:
What I do know is that you left LEGION and started attacking these so called inactive players who do nothing yet we've still maintained #1 spot (not that it matters). :icon_rolleyes:
Maybe, just maybe, I wouldn't understand what you would say because it would be stupid and I'd laugh at it? I'm liking it, you are also saying about 5-6 players in Legion are also narrow minded like me, because Oh gosh, those active ones also had the same opinions on the topic :icon_rolleyes:
Are we attacking these 'so called' inactive players? That's news to me :icon_eek:
But you continue holding on to them,
1 LEGION 239.890.014 250.827.206 61 4.111.921 30532 8.215
2 HAWKS 237.333.798 248.867.583 70 3.555.251 31481 7.905
:icon_cool::icon_cool::icon_cool::icon_cool:
err... he covered the whole K34 front, the whole k44 front, most of the k55 front, k33, part of k24. 1 player, covered more than your 3 players. I know because I'd been trying to get around him to the frontline the whole time!DiTM, he was 'spread' around those fronts, he didn't cover them all
This is a game, those "inactives" are playing it the way they want.. why kick someone for playing a game the way they want just because someone else doesnt like it. So people play this to war, noble, get involved etc etc. Others play it to pass time/boredom. Who are you to say they must play our way or not play at all!I can recall countless times many of us asking PZA to start internalling those inactives doing nothing, not responding to anything etc .. But it all comes down to his image of Legion, he would've had to kick 30% of them, which he didn't seem to think was right (lol Losing the #1 spot)
How in gods name does that make any sense. I have a very high opinion of LEGION & PZA. He has made the most of every opportunity thats arisen. ANd as for LEGION, so far we have risen above some huge struggles to be back on level terms against 3 tribes..."Blah blah, they whined about not getting any help, blah blah" then you probably have the same opinion of Legion that we do
internalling inactive players won't change the total number of points of the tribe :icon_rolleyes:
edit: assuming ppl from the top 40 internalling inactives out of the top 40 would actually increase legion's points on that first column u've got there so saying PZA7 doesn't want to noble out inactives for the rank is plain out ... what's the word u like so much? oh yeah - phale
err... he covered the whole K34 front, the whole k44 front, most of the k55 front, k33, part of k24. 1 player, covered more than your 3 players. I know because I'd been trying to get around him to the frontline the whole time!
Yet again. 3 accounts, covering full fronts - IFY didn't have every section of each of those K's covered (because if he did, you're saying the rest of LEGION had 2K's max front with HAWKS? If so, wow, major fail) Yes he did have countless nukes pounded into him, he had some major Ops on him - But he had most of those villages stacked before even having the incoming. He was 1 big account, we had 3 different accounts, doesn't mean any of us had a break from attacks :icon_idea:
This is a game, those "inactives" are playing it the way they want.. why kick someone for playing a game the way they want just because someone else doesnt like it. So people play this to war, noble, get involved etc etc. Others play it to pass time/boredom. Who are you to say they must play our way or not play at all!
The point of this game is to war, and is to noble. You pass time by actually doing these things, do you not? 'inactives are playing it the way they want' - Lol .. Really? That makes sense to you?
How in gods name does that make any sense. I have a very high opinion of LEGION & PZA. He has made the most of every opportunity thats arisen. ANd as for LEGION, so far we have risen above some huge struggles to be back on level terms against 3 tribes...
Someone suffers from memory loss - Shall we bring in some mail from said player yet again?
Your huge struggle's'? What, having to noble up IFY? Lmao, what a HUGE struggle :icon_rolleyes:
And now it seems we've even made one of the "LEGIONNAIRES" quit (please correct me if I am wrong about Mines)! Redemption is sweet.
Quit? You hit him while he was inactive, he still has over 9mil points, and now that the account is active again, what a mystery it is that he isn't losing more villages :icon_rolleyes:
stick it to him DiTM ... last time i checked if Detox didnt defect i think Hawks and E would be in huge trouble right now and are lucky to be in the position they are ... cause granted Legion hasnt really opened up on Hawks in the last couple of month more concentrating on Detox ... So hence listen up Hawkies your days are number
I love it Many know I like to stir up others, so if you think you are provoking me, then: You = Phale
FYI - You continuously prove to yourself and others how big a hypocrite you are, and everyone knows arguments with a hypocrite can be very entertaining, so amuse us further :icon_wink:
You might be on to something . hehe i'm not english speaking, I tend to make up new words now and then ^^.
And richard, I don't come here to contribute, I come here to whine at ur whining. That's all I'm here for. (/me eagerly awaits the whining response at this. (No really, there's no need at all to respond to stupid comments I write, I don't take much seriously, and we could offcourse have the next 3 pages about why I shouldn't have said you were whiners, and why i'm a hypocrite and a bigger whiner and I have no right at all, but there is really no point, I'll just keep lolling back and provoking you further, so save yourself the trouble and move on to the next issue to whine about, cause all you'll prove in the end is that I'm annoying, pointless and disturbed, and you care to much about what people think))
internalling inactive players won't change the total number of points of the tribe :icon_rolleyes:
edit: assuming ppl from the top 40 internalling inactives out of the top 40 would actually increase legion's points on that first column u've got there so saying PZA7 doesn't want to noble out inactives for the rank is plain out ... what's the word u like so much? oh yeah - phale
err... he covered the whole K34 front, the whole k44 front, most of the k55 front, k33, part of k24. 1 player, covered more than your 3 players. I know because I'd been trying to get around him to the frontline the whole time!
This is a game, those "inactives" are playing it the way they want.. why kick someone for playing a game the way they want just because someone else doesnt like it. So people play this to war, noble, get involved etc etc. Others play it to pass time/boredom. Who are you to say they must play our way or not play at all!
How in gods name does that make any sense. I have a very high opinion of LEGION & PZA. He has made the most of every opportunity thats arisen. ANd as for LEGION, so far we have risen above some huge struggles to be back on level terms against 3 tribes...
And now it seems we've even made one of the "LEGIONNAIRES" quit (please correct me if I am wrong about Mines)! Redemption is sweet.
stick it to him DiTM ... last time i checked if Detox didnt defect i think Hawks and E would be in huge trouble right now and are lucky to be in the position they are ... cause granted Legion hasnt really opened up on Hawks in the last couple of month more concentrating on Detox ... So hence listen up Hawkies your days are number
@DDRMAAX I've read your earlier posts, thus my post. Internalling inactives does not affect rank (at least negatively), what you said was not thought out well. Just admit of being wrong, it's not a big deal.
@richard 2610 considering I have support in most of the council members' villas, I doubt what you said is true and if it is, it doesn't really matter, what I do with my time is none of your or their concern or should I complain to tw staff that I'm being asked not to be part of the world forums?
lol, I don't know about you, but being in a number one tribe in tribal wars is not something I boast about to my friends or put on my CV, so I don't really see a benefit there. I wouldn't care if legion wasn't even in the top 20 of w33. not everyone cares about rank as you :lol:
if you have an alliance with a tribe and say you have nothing to do and thus have to go to war with them, loyalty would suggest notifying them that the alliance is over before taking such an act. Or be clever enough not to ask for an alliance in the first place. Attacking the same target doesn't require an alliance does it? well, since Legion and Hawks were never allied I'm gonna take a guess and say no.
I don't care what situation you were in. Anyone who knew what loyalty was wouldn't do what you did when it comes to the way you acted in legion.
I did use to be quite active you know (well I am almost back there now) so I have helped this tribe ever since we were in sins (oh sorry forgot you weren't around by then), you see this is where loyalty kicks in, but guess I wldn't expect you to understand that.
Common sense is value you have or you dont I guess you dont have that .
lmao, I'm not even gonna respond to this.
@DDRMAAX I've read your earlier posts, thus my post. Internalling inactives does not affect rank (at least negatively), what you said was not thought out well. Just admit of being wrong, it's not a big deal.
@richard 2610 considering I have support in most of the council members' villas, I doubt what you said is true and if it is, it doesn't really matter, what I do with my time is none of your or their concern or should I complain to tw staff that I'm being asked not to be part of the world forums?