DeletedUser
Guest
I don't care how many or whom he has to suck up to gain your approbation.No it doesn't go under defending. It goes under pointing out a fact. This is applicable to anyone in that situation.
(unrelated matter : There are people other than me Sasuke owed an explanation to but its a small group.)
Thats defending Sasuke, not a fact. It may be a 'fact' (yeah, its a fact that he is a liar seeking your approval) to your inner circle (ooo u own no1 an explntoin ooo), but here in the open its nothing more than you trying to defend your butt buddy. And failing to do so.
No, your intention was to de-rail the subject of Nauz flaming Sasuke for his lies, to Nauz making a not-so-good parallel in RL and hence forcing him in defense. You may have made it look like you wanted an explanation to what he said or that you just made a note that it isn't correct, but please all you wanted is to get the targeted flames on kebabe8 to stop (yeah, now they are on me :icon_rolleyes: oo i be scarez.)I didn't derail the thread at all with that post. I simply asked why the outrage comes now that events have gone sour and not before (this is a section of my post that you seem to have conveninetly forgotten to adress).
The person i directed the question to can flame the person he was flaming all he wants for all I care after he answers my question.
Hence not defending again.
For a Big Bad Flaming Machine, you really aren't that Big nor Bad. :lol:Before when I voiced my doubts as to your literacy, I was only joking. Now I'm not so sure that its not a serious affliction.