DeletedUser74386
Guest
Kev, I adore you!
DeletedUser
Guest
ill argue with you kev if your bored i like to argue an i miss it
DeletedUser
Guest
DeletedUser
Guest
well you shouldn't have made up a bunch of crap..an if you know me a curse about every other word
DeletedUser
Guest
DeletedUser
Guest
dude whatever you know i dont care for you because of what you tried to pull a long time ago if you got a problem then write me in game an we will settle this like mature people
DeletedUser
Guest
DeletedUser
Guest
i said to kev not you i dont care for you until you admit what you did was wrong an uncalled for
DeletedUser
Guest
Defending a tribe member after they are called a liar is a fair justification. If sticking up for your fellows is wrong, then I am sorry. Although it usually isn't wrong:icon_confused:
dfix
Guest
We could still argue about the past :icon_cool:
DeletedUser
Guest
I don't see a war between Ascend and ~SA~ :lol:
DeletedUser
Guest
Aha, right, because ASCEND are not supporting Evolve and Cola in their war against ~SA~ are they not? Just wait. NAPs never last forever (and they rhyme), and with ~SA~ eating up ASCENDs allies, any smart tribe leader, that being Catalina in this case, I believe (why did SV leave?), would be wise to hit ~SA~ too... just a thought...
On a side note, I saw someone say something about 1ns4n3 being boxed in on another topic :lol:. Never put the beast in a corner anyone?
DeletedUser
Guest
Nope, we're not supporting them. I would like to see proof to back up you're statement, but hell, you won't have any since its not happening.
DeletedUser
Guest
once again,
First, never and forever rhyming is a stupid point to make.
Second, do research before posting instead of citing random players as dukes.
DeletedUser
Guest
Agreed.
DeletedUser
Guest
:icon_rolleyes:
Really now?
You're going the right way about getting rimmed now. Trying to force people you want to help you into a war is a very foolish path to take.
DeletedUser
Guest
First, never and forever rhyming is a stupid point to make.
Maybe he was referring to "Naps" rhyming with something else. That was my initial take on it. I thought it was a cryptic (if it was I'm impressed) reference to a broken NAP between a certain 2 tribes...........at least that would have been close to being on topic!!
Maybe he was referring to "Naps" rhyming with something else. That was my initial take on it. I thought it was a cryptic (if it was I'm impressed) reference to a broken NAP between a certain 2 tribes...........at least that would have been close to being on topic!!
DeletedUser
Guest
well GUYZ an Gurlz im Back i hope i wasnt missed to much...A nap is a Non Aggression Pact.
guy1: We should attack them!
guy2: Sorry m8, but got a NAP with them..
nep nip nop nup naap
guy1: We should attack them!
guy2: Sorry m8, but got a NAP with them..
nep nip nop nup naap
Last edited by a moderator:
Stotty2009
Guest
So why did Shahmeer12 get dismissed?
Is it because of this?
[spoil]
This is interesting;
So this means, that the account was being sat when he was attacking 1ns4n3. And since he came back, has he attacked 1ns4n3? No. But what has he done? He got kicked from 1ns4n3. - Thats funny - only attack from sat accounts.
[/spoil]
O well, these stats still include all the players you kick, so it doesn't matter
[spoil]
[/spoil]
Is it because of this?
[spoil]
This is interesting;
Stotty2009 on 26.08. at 14:38
I nobled these off you a few days ago and you have only just noticed or something?
Stotty2009 on 26.08. at 21:06
?
Shahmeer12 on 31.08. at 20:03
This was my sitter
Shahmeer12 on 31.08. at 20:04
My computer broke down
Stotty2009 on 31.08. at 20:05
How long you been sat for?
Shahmeer12 on 31.08. at 20:06
A long time
Shahmeer12 on 31.08. at 20:06
Since I got all those attacks from Malborored
Shahmeer12 on 31.08. at 20:06
About 2 days after that
Stotty2009 on 31.08. at 20:09
So your sitter is the one who has been attacking 1ns4n3?
Shahmeer12 on 31.08. at 20:09
I have had multiple sitters
Shahmeer12 on 31.08. at 20:10
I would have never given my villages away if I was still there
Stotty2009 on 31.08. at 20:11
You didn't give your villages away, you lose them lol
Shahmeer12 today at 13:14
Yeah I know
So this means, that the account was being sat when he was attacking 1ns4n3. And since he came back, has he attacked 1ns4n3? No. But what has he done? He got kicked from 1ns4n3. - Thats funny - only attack from sat accounts.
[/spoil]
O well, these stats still include all the players you kick, so it doesn't matter
[spoil]
[/spoil]
