DeletedUser
Guest
No need Assasin - I cry often regarding w18. Daily, infact
However often you post is entirely up to you.
If your personal goal is to post everyday, then that's your call, chief.
No need Assasin - I cry often regarding w18. Daily, infact
PeterPaine said:For example, SN wants to be treated like his arguments are sound, rational, informed, and mature. Yet, his comments (most often) exhibit none of these qualities. He just WANTS us to treat them as such. Well, I won't.
PeterPaine said:I was just having some fun with you.
I doubt SN wants to be treated as you say. He says what he says for fun. But I'll let him speak for himself...
And I was having fun with you... Thats the only reason I'm here. Because I enjoy it here...
the turning the world blue thing is an utopy and a very boring one.
http://map.k-io.com/viewall.php?map_id=22 you'll see that w12 is basically won by some family. they have over 90% dominance in all K's
still they won't shut down that world. you see big holes: players quitted by boredom. some noobs will stay for years while the others keep paying premium for a pointless world.
I just wanted to make sure this didn't get over-stressed. It has long been one of the tribal strategies.
Various people have used the argument that we only go for inactives - when in fact inactives are typically just a way to get closer to the actives. Apoc-C, for instance, has been a traveling tribe. That's one way we overcame the land-lock that plagued fear, and tribes and players that focus on just one K.
I don't think anyone would say, for instance, EmmanuelFr is inactive - far from it - but for instance most of my own attacks on him in k47 came from a position I came into by eating Hironami in K46... And though she deleted before we got there, both Ks - for me - were positioning on the way to K58 to pay MsBella a visit. I'm a looong way from my home K00 already - and it's been a combination of actives and inactives.
It's also been a strategy to intermingle our members for mutual defense and cooperation. Some say they don't want to jumble themselves with other players or family tribes - both inside the tribe and in enemy tribes - but I find it to be a strength. I'll leave the multitude examples of "why" for another post.
The strategy is both sensible and it works. I suspect that the game reasons for your deletion were not that you were bored waiting for an attack but you saw that Apoc was on the road to inevitable victory.
Personally I don't see taking out (semi)inactives as a bad play. In fact it is the most sensible play. As long as those red dots (not grey) are turning blue and the majority of the membership are getting involved then, as a leader, I am happy.
If someone wants to focus on an active player then that's fine from a pure enjoyment perspective but if that active is benign and there are nearby inactives then I would recommend the inactive. The active's time will come, in the meantime let them clean out the local garbage. Of course if that active starts molesting our players that's when that player gets an Op.
I can only apologise that we didn't make life a little more uncomfortable for you but end result was essentially the same, you were defeated (resignation still equates to loss) and the Apoc juggernaut rolled on...
Once they were ALL achieved, there was really no point in my staying as you were NEVER going to defeat me - you had the numbers but not the skill
@ dhudson: when you've had hundreds/thousands of incomings on a daily basis for many months (up to almost 7K), from several tribes, and can still manage to grow, then feel free to talk to me about so-called illusions.