SCUM voted 'Best in Bed'. <-- True Story

[DeletedUser]

You can post as many stats as you like Toby, they are not acceptable and unrealistic.

the voice of reason lol thanks mate I needed someone to take me out of this loop.

Irony at it's greatest.


Side 1:
Tribes: pRo SCUM ~RIP~
Players: GrandDragon flukenz strike raider

Side 2:
Tribes: Rally
Players: Suryt Bourbon1 knife75 john corbit theignorantmasses joepathan fkato kiurbis

Timeframe: Last 3 months

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 429
Side 2: 268
Difference: 161

Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 4,078,719
Side 2: 2,214,055
Difference: 1,864,664

 

[dfix]

Side 1:
Tribes: Rally
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: SCUM
Players: GrandDragon flukenz,
MR RED strike raider (as they had quit I'v added the villages hey lost to Rally in and out of SCUM)

Timeframe: 24/11/2009 00:00:00 to 02/01/2010 23:18:28

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 297
Side 2: 88
Difference: 209

It is over two moths since SCUM's declaration on Rally and NERD, ever from day one Rally showed remarkable stats, they said 'not yet' 'that will change very soon' and it did, very much to my likening 1:2 caps ratio become 1:3 and even 1:4 at times and it was clear where those the wind blows.

At the day of declaration SCUM had 26 members, every time that a SCUM player gets an OP and losses some villages woop his dismissed, 5 players out of 26 where dismissed (and the door is still open for more to come) and as it's members SCUM lost all it had in W37 - prestige, a fearful name and reputation for it's skill.

 

[DeletedUser]

SCUM lost all it had in W37 - prestige, a fearful name and reputation for it's skill.

I don't think I would leave it up to their enemies to decide that genius.

 

[DeletedUser]

I don't think I would leave it up to their enemies to decide that genius.

Although I don't think they've lost their skill or prestige, I think it would be ignorant to say their reputation is not damaged, or do you disagree?

 

[DeletedUser]

tbh i think scum is a very skillfull tribe its gonan b tought getting them to lose villages other the coming months!!

not so tough for them to drop players though whos next on the ooo he went inactive list

 

[DeletedUser]

Although I don't think they've lost their skill or prestige, I think it would be ignorant to say their reputation is not damaged, or do you disagree?

Oh I would definitely say their reputation has taken a hit, but SCUM can bounce back.

tbh i think scum is a very skillfull tribe its gonan b tought getting them to lose villages other the coming months!!

not so tough for them to drop players though whos next on the ooo he went inactive list

I don't know if you realize, but the only reason they drop inactive players is because they do not like to carry the deadweight. It's not so they look good in the war stats. They even give permission to include those players in the war stats.

 

[DeletedUser]

funny they decalre so these players can get some action these players get plenty off action adn lose lots off villages then they get droped!! is that just me or is ti just that you really dont look after your players!! dont worry tony once we had scum we will start the main ops against pRo and show them what scum has to go though! see if they show the same level off loyaty to there players

mind u im sure u dont recruit refegues how is vann ????

 

[DeletedUser]

funny they decalre so these players can get some action these players get plenty off action adn lose lots off villages then they get droped!! is that just me or is ti just that you really dont look after your players!! dont worry tony once we had scum we will start the main ops against pRo and show them what scum has to go though! see if they show the same level off loyaty to there players

Lmao, I'll be waiting for a decent op. You can't run ops on two fronts? What is the problem? Are you not pRo?

mind u im sure u dont recruit refegues how is vann ????

If vaan is to be considered a refugee by anyone, it should be pRo. pRo took down Bio and forced them to merge with Rally. We then took in three Bio players that actually showed potential. Me thinks you're just mad that they left Rally in disgust. Have a problem with that? Settle it on the battlefield.

I am sure it would be the first battle you settle in this war, because as of the start date, you have nobled nothing but barbs and inactives.

 

[DeletedUser]

Nice hat toby


:villagers:

(I had to look for a few minutes to find something on topic so I could post that, so here goes)

tbh i think scum is a very skillfull tribe its gonan b tought getting them to lose villages other the coming months!!

not so tough for them to drop players though whos next on the ooo he went inactive list

Scum does have a lot of individual skill, but numbers trump isolated players any day. In the end, this IS just a game. If you're not having fun, why play? A few scum players have quit because they wernt having fun, and the most likely reason they wernt having fun is the mass incomings. Even if they're not all co-ordinated, its demoralizing.

 

[DeletedUser]

Nice hat toby


:villagers:

(I had to look for a few minutes to find something on topic so I could post that, so here goes)



Scum does have a lot of individual skill, but numbers trump isolated players any day. In the end, this IS just a game. If you're not having fun, why play? A few scum players have quit because they wernt having fun, and the most likely reason they wernt having fun is the mass incomings. Even if they're not all co-ordinated, its demoralizing.

JON I love you :icon_redface:

 

[dfix]

Side 1:
Tribes: Rally
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: SCUM
Players: GrandDragon flukenz
MR RED strike raider (as they had quit I've added the villages they lost to Rally in and out of SCUM)

Timeframe: 24/11/2009 00:00:00 to 05/01/2010 14:59:11


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 320
Side 2: 92
Difference: 228

Psst... I can tell you a secret, very soon waffenTDR will go "inactive"

Why? because we are kicking him badly, probably the next dismissed member of SCUM.

 

[DeletedUser]

Side 1:
Tribes: Rally
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: SCUM
Players: GrandDragon flukenz
MR RED strike raider (as they had quit I've added the villages they lost to Rally in and out of SCUM)

Timeframe: 24/11/2009 00:00:00 to 05/01/2010 14:59:11


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 320
Side 2: 92
Difference: 228

Psst... I can tell you a secret, very soon waffenTDR will go "inactive"

Why? because we are kicking him badly, probably the next dismissed member of SCUM.

Yeah, all two conquers. Nice job.

 

[DeletedUser]

Psst... I can tell you a secret, very soon waffenTDR will go "inactive"

Why? because we are kicking him badly, probably the next dismissed member of SCUM.

Yeah,nice Op last 24 hrs

Village Points Old owner New owner Date/Time
luicho2 (802|568) K58 4,424 luicho [T.J.P] Jbo1218 [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 18:52:47
I R PrO NuB (794|714) K77 8,698 vaan1693 [pRo] Bryangenius [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 18:43:07
I R PrO NuB (816|707) K78 8,969 vaan1693 [pRo] ragnarok7 [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 18:25:15
Barbarian village (770|707) K77 3,689 Abandoned mjr guard [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 18:22:28
68.22.52 I hate red dots (822|625) K68 9,732 flukenz roclys [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 18:15:06
68.02.70 I hate red dots (820|607) K68 9,637 flukenz shaun1102 [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 18:06:59
Barbarian village (881|670) K68 1,487 Abandoned Adams442 [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 17:26:58
<DOM> (854|593) K58 9,735 the gravedigger [Rally] aviator 172 [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 17:01:01
Barbarian village (919|644) K69 1,532 Abandoned linkyou [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 16:31:54
Barbarian village (898|654) K68 1,544 Abandoned linkyou [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 16:01:05
Barbarian village (890|672) K68 1,536 Abandoned linkyou [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 15:54:49
Barbarian village (882|677) K68 1,507 Abandoned linkyou [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 15:52:07
AK-011 (694|653) K66 7,929 aprajit [Rally] Vesve [pRo] 05th Jan 2010 - 15:39:00
Barbarian village (886|672) K68 1,511 Abandoned linkyou [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 15:38:38
Barbarian village (921|651) K69 1,503 Abandoned linkyou [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 15:26:18
gear up (802|756) K78 4,569 Dobber33 [Rally] agreedy1 [SPQ] 05th Jan 2010 - 15:26:06
Rally XXXV (811|628) K68 9,699 flukenz khrisingkit [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 15:26:02
Barbarian village (808|622) K68 1,675 Abandoned roclys [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 15:25:02
Barbarian village (966|499) K49 1,510 Abandoned kieran 123 [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 15:20:23
God Of War.002 (829|601) K68 9,712 flukenz mrtosun [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 15:14:55
Barbarian village (915|646) K69 1,520 Abandoned linkyou [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 14:52:44
1st Street (869|771) K78 8,475 Lord Oda Nobunaga [Rally] brian67 [~T2W~] 05th Jan 2010 - 13:24:58
Corinthian-43- (719|730) K77 9,880 Bourbon1 [Rally] corinski [pRo] 05th Jan 2010 - 11:21:26
022f (823|756) K78 9,984 Abandoned Dobber33 [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 10:29:15
D 001 (768|708) K77 9,579 Abandoned Rcp061 [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 10:20:45
C 11 (765|664) K67 1,559 Abandoned mjr guard [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 10:14:08
McToots 51 Village (811|679) K68 1,820 Abandoned rozmctoot [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 10:12:12
I <3 Daz (819|705) K78 8,360 vaan1693 [pRo] ragnarok7 [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 08:12:23
3 wanna (932|693) K69 6,527 jt1895 [Rally] DwJavi [~T2W~] 05th Jan 2010 - 08:08:07
Barbarian village (903|555) K59 1,517 Abandoned janostheender [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 07:53:33
pot-1 (690|533) K56 8,864 Ipeefreely [Rally] GrandDragon 05th Jan 2010 - 07:47:52
3 wanna (932|693) K69 6,527 brightspark [FIGHT!] jt1895 [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 07:47:35
gear up (802|756) K78 4,481 Artyblast [Cola] Dobber33 [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 07:03:29
The Land of Absolute Awesomeness (996|552) K59 1,648 danielqazxsw [Rally] Rockmagi [-13DS-] 05th Jan 2010 - 06:51:46
1st Street (869|771) K78 8,455 Abandoned Lord Oda Nobunaga [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 05:59:02
Barbarian village (750|762) K77 8,704 Abandoned nash26 [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 05:54:54
Barbarian village (921|517) K59 1,484 Abandoned Temmi [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 05:37:02
001 Lille (792|755) K77 9,300 thievass jrsudd7 [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 05:36:41
Barbarian village (947|682) K69 1,416 Abandoned lonedwolf [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 05:34:47
C 10 (781|645) K67 1,512 Abandoned mjr guard [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 05:18:27
Barbarian village (912|209) K29 277 Abandoned stinger1 [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 04:10:53
Barbarian village (908|524) K59 1,503 Abandoned Gorkky [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 03:48:26
L014 - L014 (834|513) K58 1,512 Abandoned mankama [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 02:59:50
NRC 023 (983|581) K59 420 Abandoned Nightranger4000 [Rally] 05th Jan 2010 - 02:12:55

 

[DeletedUser]

I really didn't realize that players who most likely (as in I'm not checking) are completely surrounded by their tribemates and with no decent villes around, are not allowed to noble barbs. There would be no other way by which for them to grow unless they take some barbs.

I'm guessing that most of those people who took barbs did so because otherwise their nobles would just sit around doing nothing forever. You would too if by some miracle you were a smallish player and you had no front which to attack.

Believe it or not, there ARE times when barb nobling would be acceptable. For instance if you nobled a few barbs to get closer to the action. 100+ hour noble trains at working targets generally don't work.

 

[DeletedUser]

I really didn't realize that players who most likely (as in I'm not checking) are completely surrounded by their tribemates and with no decent villes around, are not allowed to noble barbs. There would be no other way by which for them to grow unless they take some barbs.

I'm guessing that most of those people who took barbs did so because otherwise their nobles would just sit around doing nothing forever. You would too if by some miracle you were a smallish player and you had no front which to attack.

Believe it or not, there ARE times when barb nobling would be acceptable. For instance if you nobled a few barbs to get closer to the action. 100+ hour noble trains at working targets generally don't work.

When all of NERD is literally one continent away from an enemy at most, you would expect them to step it up and participate in ops, would you not? That is not generally 100 hours.

Just checked, diagonally across a K is 80 hours :icon_neutral:

 

[DeletedUser]

When all of NERD is literally one continent away from an enemy at most, you would expect them to step it up and participate in ops, would you not? That is not generally 100 hours.

Just checked, diagonally across a K is 80 hours :icon_neutral:

Aye but your argument doens't hold up when you take into account that nerd IS NOBELING enemy villages in addition to the barb ones. We have to fight on multiple fronts, the "barb" nobeling is done in the K's furthest from the core and where the front lines need to be solidified.

But keep trying to bash NERD, its worked wonders thus far.

 

[DeletedUser]

Aye but your argument doens't hold up when you take into account that nerd IS NOBELING enemy villages in addition to the barb ones. We have to fight on multiple fronts, the "barb" nobeling is done in the K's furthest from the core and where the front lines need to be solidified.

But keep trying to bash NERD, its worked wonders thus far.

One noble spent on a barb, is one noble that could have been spent on an enemy village.

 

[DeletedUser]

One noble spent on a barb, is one noble that could have been spent on an enemy village.

One noble spent on a barb is also a guaranteed village which could produce many many more nobles from which to take enemy villages..

..an enemy village is not guaranteed, closer to unlikely

Each side of the debate has it's merits. To simply class barb nobling as bad is ignorant. To class nobling purely enemies as bad would also be ignorant. Everything must be looked at individually, based on it's own corcumstances and merits.

 

[DeletedUser]

A 9k village or a 1.5k village?

The better choice is obvious.

Barb nobling small villages is for those incapable of taking decent villages off other players.

 

[DeletedUser]

Better, cost effective, logical, tactical, strategical, geographical are merely a few things that must be looked at.

As I said, everything must be looked at. Many people (clearly yourself included) simply shun it as for crap players only. I don't barb noble myself, but I am open minded enough to accept it has it's merits.

Again, I am not agreeing with their methods (nor am I agreeing with you), simply stating that to straight out rule out either side is ignorance.

Edit: Oh, and the fact that most neutral players (including the mod) have said that barb nobling can be a good strategy would sort of imply that maybe it is. I'm not saying you should agree with it, just that dismissing it as for the crap only is wrong. Take Hoang Nghiem, he did it on W44 (sub 500 point barbs mind you) and is still top and renowned as one of the greatest players there is.

Don't be so narrow minded.